Torah
Parshat Shemot
By:
Why do Am Yisrael suffer such terrible oppression in
Several midrashim connect the Egyptian exile to sins committed by Avraham. In a well-known passage (Bereishit ), the Ramban explains that Avram’s lack of faith in God is responsible for these terrible events. As the Ramban states, both Avram’s departure from
The Gemara (Nedarim 32a) takes this approach one step further, claiming that Avram’s descendants are punished because he made Torah scholars cease their studies to go to war to free
This is strange indeed. It is one thing to blame Avraham for behavior which does appear to be questionable. But the excessive attention paid to Avraham’s wrongdoing seems unwarranted in attempting to explain Am Yisrael’s slavery. Why focus negatively on Avraham, our gentle and pious forefather?
The most apparent reason that so many midrashim point a finger at Avraham is because he is personally informed, during the brit ben ha-betarim (Bereishit 15), of Am Yisrael’s future exile and suffering. The fact that the decree was already in place during his lifetime suggests that he is responsible for it. There are, moreover, many salient linguistic connections between Avram’s journey to
Nevertheless, the argument can be advanced that even if Avram did sin by going down to
Let us examine, then, another story in Avram’s life, which contains even more direct parallels to the story of
1. Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no children. She had an Egyptian maidservant whose name was Hagar. 2. And Sarai said to Abram, "See, now, Hashem has restrained me from bearing; consort, now, with my maidservant, perhaps I will be built up through her." And Abram heeded the voice of Sarai. 4. So Sarai, Abram's wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her maidservant – after ten years of Abram's dwelling in the
The similarities to Am Yisrael’s enslavement are striking. Sarai afflicts her Egyptian maidservant, who flees to the desert, to the
While the Ramban notes that Sarai undoubtedly sinned here, as did Avram in allowing Sarai to do as she wished (Ramban on Bereishit 16:6), and that therefore Hagar had a son who would be a thorn in Israel’s side, he does not explicitly connect the enslavement in Egypt and this event. Nonetheless, it is difficult to avoid that conclusion. The fact that the entire story of Yetziat Mitzrayim begins with the sale of Joseph to the Yishmaelim should immediately indicate the connection between these stories, as Hagar’s descendants “return the favor” by forcing Sarai’s descendants to experience themselves Hagar’s suffering.
Even if Sarai’s reaction to Hagar’s taunts is understandable, many mefarshim (Radak, Ramban) consider Sarai’s behavior excessively harsh. There is no tolerance for cruelty in Judaism. Judaism simply demands a higher moral standard. Perhaps the story of Sarai’s harshness to a servant is precisely what created the need to reverse the roles so that Am Yisrael, as part of their formation as a nation, would experience suffering, would know what it means to be a slave, weak and vulnerable. In this way, the moral fabric of the Jewish nation is woven by its own experience of slavery. It is from this experience that Jews are meant to learn how to behave in a morally superior fashion.
The educational aspect of the slavery in
- do not oppress the stranger (Shemot ; 23:9);
- the slave’s right to rest on Shabbat (Devarim -15);
- giving the slave gifts upon his release from slavery (Devarim -15);
- not working slaves harshly (Vayikra 25:43);
- the obligation to work to redeem our brothers from slavery (Vayikra 25:55).
Thus, Yetziat Mitzrayim is an event that corrects Sarai’s behavior, while at the same time educating and elevating the nascent nation to a morally superior position. This new morality is intended to have universal repercussions, as
Additional shiurim
from this category can be found in: |
Parshat Shavua (Shmot) |
Uploaded: | Wednesday, December 26, 2007 |